Audit evidence · v2026.05

Citations.

Every claim, clause, article, court case and standard the course cites, each linked to its primary source. Re-walked quarterly. Found a broken link or an error? The complaints route is on this page.

§
Confidence levels

verified, text-checked against the primary source on the last review.

well-known, widely cited and expected accurate; not text-checked on this pass.

flag, needs human verification before next release. We publish these openly rather than hide them.

EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689

primary: EUR-Lex
RefClaimConfidence
Art 4AI literacy obligation on providers and deployers ("take measures to support" since the 2026 Digital Omnibus); applies from 2 Feb 2025well-known
Art 5Prohibited AI practices; applies from 2 Feb 2025well-known
Art 13Information for deployers from providers of high-risk AIwell-known
Art 14Human oversight of high-risk AI systemswell-known
Art 22Authorised Representatives of Providers of High-Risk AI Systems. (Resolved 2026-05-19, earlier mis-cross-ref removed from standards-map.)verified
Art 26Deployer obligations, instructions, monitoring, logging, informationwell-known
Art 27Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA)well-known
Art 50Transparency, deepfakes labelled, AI-generated text on matters of public interest disclosedwell-known
Art 53GPAI providers publish training-data summarywell-known
Art 73Serious incident reportingwell-known
Annex IIIHigh-risk AI use cases, employment, education, essential services, biometrics, justice, migration, infrastructurewell-known
Art 99Penalties, up to €35M or 7% global turnoverwell-known

ISO/IEC 42001:2023

primary: iso.org
RefClaimConfidence
Cl 5.2AI policy, documented, communicatedwell-known
Cl 6.1Risks and opportunities; AI risk assessmentwell-known
Cl 7.2Competencewell-known
Cl 7.3Awarenesswell-known
Cl 7.5Documented informationwell-known
A.2Policies for AI usewell-known
A.3.2"AI Roles and Responsibilities" (NOT "AI policy", earlier mistake). AI policy lives at A.2.verified
A.4.6Human resources: the competence of the people working with AI systems (A.4.5 is system and computing resources; corrected 11 Oct 2026)well-known
A.5.2AI system impact assessmentwell-known
A.6.2AI system life cycle (requirements, design, verification, deployment, operation). Fairness is an objective under A.6.1.2, not a control of its ownwell-known
A.6.2.5"AI-System Deployment" (NOT "documented procedures for incidents", earlier mistake). Incident handling sits at A.6.2.6 (Operation and Monitoring) and A.8.4 (Communication of incidents). M10 reference corrected.verified
A.7Data for AI systemswell-known
A.9Use of AI systems (performance evaluation is Clause 9 of the main body, a separate thing)well-known
A.10Third-party AI relationshipswell-known

NIST AI RMF + OWASP LLM Top 10

primary: NIST · OWASP
RefClaimConfidence
AI RMF 1.0Govern · Map · Measure · Manageverified
AI 600-1Generative-AI specific profile, Jul 2024well-known
SP 800-50r1Building a cybersecurity and privacy learning programme (Rev 1, Sep 2024); uses training on approved generative-AI tools as a worked examplewell-known
LLM01-10The ten categories of the 2025 edition are cited in standards-map, for reference. OWASP published a 2026 edition in Aug 2026 that renumbers the list; the map has not yet been moved to itwell-known

Case-law and named incidents

primary: court records, regulator publications, named press
CiteClaim and sourceConfidence
Mata v. AviancaTwo US attorneys and their firm sanctioned (US$5,000) for filing six AI-invented case citations. S.D.N.Y. 22-cv-1461; opinion 22 Jun 2023well-known
Arup deepfakeA Hong Kong finance employee transferred HK$200m (about US$25m, £20m) in 15 payments in Jan 2024 after a deepfake video call. Disclosed by Hong Kong police Feb 2024; Arup confirmed it was the victim May 2024well-known
Samsung leakEngineers pasted proprietary source code and meeting notes into ChatGPT; leaks reported 30 Mar 2023, upload size capped, then generative AI banned on company devices (reported 2 May 2023). Economist Korea / Bloombergwell-known
UK GDPR maximum fineUp to £17.5 million or 4% of total annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. UK GDPR Article 83(5); Data Protection Act 2018, section 157well-known
72-hour breach reportA personal data breach that risks people's rights and freedoms must be reported to the ICO (the Information Commission since Sep 2026) without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours of becoming aware of it. UK GDPR Article 33well-known
NYT v. OpenAIS.D.N.Y. 1:23-cv-11195, filed Dec 2023well-known
Getty v. Stability AIUK [2023] EWHC 3090 (Ch) (interim) and [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) (trial judgment, 4 Nov 2025). US: D.Del. 1:23-cv-00135, dismissed and refiled in N.D. Cal. in Aug 2025 (citation corrected 11 Oct 2026)well-known
Authors Guild v. OpenAIS.D.N.Y. 1:23-cv-08292, Sept 2023well-known
Doe v. GitHubN.D. Cal. 4:22-cv-06823, Nov 2022well-known
US Copyright Officecopyright.gov/ai/, fully AI-generated material with no significant human authorship is not copyrightablewell-known
NYC Local Law 144Automated employment decision tools, bias audit requirement; effective 1 Jan 2023, enforced from 5 Jul 2023well-known
Illinois AIVI Act820 ILCS 42, AI Video Interview Actwell-known
Colorado SB21-169Insurance unfair discrimination from AI usewell-known
Utah SB 149 (2024)Utah AI Policy Actwell-known

Audit-pass policy

This page is re-walked every quarter as part of the standards refresh (see the changelog for cadence). Any flag item must be resolved before any marketing push or commercial launch. If you find an error, please use the complaints procedure.